Commentary and perspectives on AI from across social media, with context from The LLM Brief. What was said, who said it, and what the replies added. No spin, no pile-ons. 2 stories, newest first.
The interesting part is who replied. Thibault Sottiaux of OpenAI answered "this is the way", which is a competitor endorsing a rival's move toward a shared standard, and the loudest pushback was that supporting AGENTS.md is bare-minimum rather than generous. Both readings point the same way: the file format is settling into a convention no single vendor owns, and the question underneath is Claude Code mods, the customisation layer this shipped on top of.
An inbox proves intent and budget, not any particular undisclosed post. The harder case is early access, where the consideration is the privilege itself rather than a fee. Disclosure rules are written around money, and an embargo slot does not feel like payment to the person accepting it. That is why the pitch marked "[Paid]" is the least interesting thing in the screenshot. The ones that never need the tag are the ones already working.
